Apple's New iPad: No Girls Allowed

By K.A. Laity

Yeah, everyone was excited about the unveiling of the new Apple tablet computer. They braced themselves for the inevitable Twitter crash (which didn't seem to happen after all). 

Geeks everywhere were poised to trumpet or decry the new product depending upon where they positioned themselves along the Steve-Jobs-Messiah-or-Huckster continuum.  But the one thing that seemed to be overlooked was the impact of the name.

I'm sure they did a lot of testing, but I just can't believe there was a woman on the team or at least one in an important enough position to say, "No, no, hell no!" when it came to naming it the iPad.

WTF?!

It took next to no time for iTampon to become a trending topic on Twitter, rivaling "Apple iPad" itself in the top three.  Just about every woman I know on Twitter (and eventually on Facebook, too) began making up jokes or forwarding someone else's (except for those following #dbw).  An old bit from Mad TV was resurrected and replayed across YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.

I may be wrong to suspect that there wasn't a single woman on the design team; after all, one of my pals suggested that there were women on the team but they just thought, "Fine, assholes, go ahead...." (thanks, Dan).  However, I can't help thinking that here's a common sense and very visible example of how including the input of women can make your life better, tech guys.

Instead of the focus being on how cool the new toy is, half your audience at least is giggling about the name. Way to go!

The larger and far more important point is you should be wondering how many less visible and less risible ways the same neglect is affecting your product.  It's just insanely negligent to think that women aren't essential to the development of truly useful tech.  Yeah, I still want an iPad, if you're wondering. But I only plan to use it about three days every month…

Image via SuperBleeder

POSTED IN: TECH
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00 (GMT+00)
4 Responses
1.

Too much Star Trek, too few dates. Yes we know it was named for the same item in ST but hello... still stupid.

db
Thu, 28-Jan-2010 01:29 GMT
2.

I was hepped to that by my pal Brad Brooks, but yeah, you're right -- dumb name. See also products like "Nads" hair remover or "Ayds" appetite suppressants.

K. A. Laity
Thu, 28-Jan-2010 03:42 GMT
3.

Oh god, Nads! That weird green goo didn't actually taste half bad!

rosina rubylips
Thu, 28-Jan-2010 09:55 GMT
4.

HA HA HA HA!

K. A. Laity
Thu, 28-Jan-2010 20:58 GMT

Add Comment

Note: Your email address will be verified but will never be published on the site.

If you are a registered user, please Sign In.




The opinions expressed by the author and commenters are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BitchBuzz or any employer or organisation. The aforementioned are not responsible for the accuracy of content published.